A Different Approach to Preventing Thrombosis



Status:Completed
Conditions:Cardiology, Cardiology, Cardiology, Cardiology, Cardiology
Therapuetic Areas:Cardiology / Vascular Diseases
Healthy:No
Age Range:18 - Any
Updated:8/29/2018
Start Date:January 2016
End Date:September 2017

Use our guide to learn which trials are right for you!

A Different Approach to Preventing Thrombosis (ADAPT): A Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Low Molecular Weight Heparin to Acetylsalicylic Acid in Orthopedic Trauma Patients

The purpose of this study is to perform a pragmatic randomized controlled trial to compare
the use of low molecular weight heparin (LMWH, lovenox, enoxaparin) versus acetylsalicylic
acid (ASA) for venous thromboembolism (VTE) prophylaxis in patients with high-risk lower
extremity fractures.

Purpose:

To perform a pragmatic randomized controlled trial of the use of low molecular weight heparin
(LMWH, enoxaparin, lovenox) versus Aspirin (ASA) for VTE prophylaxis in patients with
high-risk extremity fractures.

Specific Aims:

1. To compare the bleeding complication outcomes associated with LMWH versus ASA in
patients receiving VTE prophylaxis following high-risk lower extremity fractures.

2. To compare the incidence of clinically important VTE events associated with LMWH versus
ASA for VTE prophylaxis in patients receiving VTE prophylaxis following high-risk lower
extremity fractures.

3. To compare the 6-month treatment costs associated with VTE prophylaxis using either LMWH
or ASA for high-risk lower extremity fracture patients

Hypothesis:

1. Among patients with high risk lower extremity fractures receiving VTE prophylaxis, the
rate of bleeding complications will be lower for patients receiving ASA compared to
those receiving LMWH.

2. Among patients with high risk lower extremity fractures receiving VTE prophylaxis, the
rate of VTE for patients receiving ASA will be no greater than those receiving LMWH.

3. Among patients with high risk lower extremity fractures receiving VTE prophylaxis, the
6-month treatment costs will be lower for patients receiving ASA compared to those
receiving LMWH.

Methods/Outcomes:

A randomized controlled trial will be conducted to assess the use of LMWH versus ASA for VTE
prophylaxis in patients with high-risk extremity fractures.

The aim-specific outcomes to be collected are as follows:

1. A composite of the following major bleeding related complications:

1. Fatal bleeding into a critical organ (retroperitoneal, intracranial, intraocular,
intraspinal)

2. Clinically overt bleed with a > 2g/dL drop in Hb or requiring > 2U transfusion

3. Wound drainage or hematoma requiring reoperation

4. Diagnosis of deep surgical site infection

2. VTE Events defined as a composite of any symptomatic proximal DVT (in the femoral or
popliteal vessels), or PE (central, segmental or subsegmental). All VTE events will be
confirmed using multiplanar CT scan or formal venous duplex exam.

3. Cost of VTE prophylaxis treatment, VTE events and bleeding related complications.

Data Collection:

Patients meeting inclusion/exclusion criteria will be prospectively randomized to one of two
treatment arms. Block randomization will be used. Patients will receive VTE prophylaxis as
allocated, and followed for their index hospitalization and a 3month period post discharge
for VTE events and bleeding complications. Outcome data will be prospectively collected
during index hospitalization, and at 2 weeks and 3 months post discharge, and blind analysis
and interpretation of results will be performed at 50% and 100% recruitment.

Data Analysis:

All data will be reported as mean and standard deviations for continuous variables and
proportions and percentages for categorical data. Kaplan-Meier survival and Cox proportional
hazard analysis will be completed for time to VTE and bleeding complication outcomes.
Sub-group analysis will include Injury Severity Score and fracture location. An independent
Data Safety and Monitoring Committee will complete interim analysis at 50% recruitment. A
cost analysis will be conducted using a 6month and lifetime time horizon with a societal
perspective. Component costs will consist of: VTE prophylaxis costs, unscheduled follow-ups,
emergency room visit, hospital admission or unscheduled repeat surgical intervention for VTE
or bleeding complications.

Study Treatment Arms:

1. VTE prophylaxis with Enoxaparin 30mg SC BID

2. VTE prophylaxis with ASA 81mg PO BID

Inclusion Criteria:

- All patients treated at a level-1 trauma center with any one or more of the following
injuries: Pelvis fracture (operative or non-operative), Acetabulum fracture (operative
or non-operative), or any operative extremity fracture (proximal to
metatarsals/carpals)

- Age greater than or equal to 18 years old

Exclusion Criteria:

- Patients receiving pre-existing confounding prophylaxis or therapeutic anticoagulation
(not to include anti-platelet agents) prior to admission or those receiving greater
than one dose of LMWH since injury

- Patients with pre-existing coagulopathy

- Patients with a previous history of VTE within the last 6 months

- Patients who are pregnant

- Patients with CNS or spinal cord injury with potential need for further neurosurgical
intervention precluding anticoagulation with aspirin

- Patients with active bleeding precluding the use of anticoagulation

- Impaired creatinine clearance <30ml/min at the time of randomization

- History of Heparin Induced Thrombocytopenia or ASA or NSAID allergy

- Prisoners

- Non-english speaking patients

- Patients who have an indication for therapeutic anticoagulation

- Patients deemed inappropriate for inclusion in the study by their treating physician.
Reason must be documented

- Patients who would not normally receive VTE prophylaxis for their injury
We found this trial at
1
site
22 S Greene St
Baltimore, Maryland 21201
(410) 328-8667
University of Maryland Medical Center Founded in 1823 as the Baltimore Infirmary, the University of...
?
mi
from
Baltimore, MD
Click here to add this to my saved trials