Digital vs Conventional Impressions Study
| Status: | Recruiting |
|---|---|
| Healthy: | No |
| Age Range: | 18 - Any |
| Updated: | 5/4/2018 |
| Start Date: | October 16, 2017 |
| End Date: | December 31, 2018 |
| Contact: | Rita Cacciato |
| Email: | rita_cacciato@urmc.rochester.edu |
| Phone: | 585-275-9001 |
Clinical Evaluation of Digital Versus Conventional Impressions Part I: Marginal and Internal Fit
This study aims to compare how a single cap best fit on a tooth that is fabricated with
digital and conventional impression techniques.
digital and conventional impression techniques.
Inclusion Criteria:
- Age of patient ≥ 18 years old
- Good oral hygiene and compliance
- In need of a single full-coverage crown on any vital premolar or first molar tooth
- Opposing tooth is free of indirect restoration (crown)
- Asymptomatic tooth free of pathology
- No requirement for additional treatment (endodontic treatment, post and core, crown
lengthening)
- Anticipated supragingival or equigingival crown margin
- Anticipated crown margin on natural tooth structure
- Adequate abutment height after tooth preparation (minimum 4mm)
Exclusion Criteria:
- Age of patient less than 18 years old
- Poor oral hygiene and calculus on sample teeth
- In need of a single full-coverage crown on tooth other than a vital premolar or first
molar tooth
- Opposing tooth is restored with indirect restoration
- Periapical or periodontal pathology
- Anticipated pulp exposure or need for additional treatment (endodontic treatment, post
and core, crown lengthening)
- Anticipated subgingival crown margin
- Anticipated crown margin on direct restoration
- Inadequate abutment height after tooth preparation
We found this trial at
1
site
60 Crittenden Blvd # 70
Rochester, New York 14642
Rochester, New York 14642
(585) 275-2121
Principal Investigator: Konstantinos Chochlidakis
Phone: 585-275-9001
University of Rochester The University of Rochester is one of the country's top-tier research universities....
Click here to add this to my saved trials
