A Biomarker Study in Advanced Mucosal or Acral Lentiginous Melanoma Receiving Nivolumab in Combination With Ipilimumab
Status: | Recruiting |
---|---|
Conditions: | Skin Cancer |
Therapuetic Areas: | Oncology |
Healthy: | No |
Age Range: | 18 - Any |
Updated: | 1/11/2019 |
Start Date: | December 2016 |
End Date: | December 2021 |
A Study to Estimate the Anti-Tumor Activity and Identify Potential Predictors of Response in Patients With Advanced Mucosal or Acral Lentiginous Melanoma Receiving Standard Nivolumab in Combination With Ipilimumab Followed by Nivolumab Monotherapy
Participants with advanced or metastatic mucosal melanoma (cohort A) and acral lentiginous
melanoma (cohort B) eligible for treatment with nivolumab in combination with ipilimumab
followed by nivolumab therapy will submit tissue blocks from tumors of malignant melanoma for
histopathology review and immunohistochemistry analysis at Georgetown University-Lombardi
Comprehensive Cancer Center. Pretreatment blood will be drawn and stored in the Melanoma
Research Foundation Breakthrough Consortium Virtual Repository at each participating
institution. At the end of participation, samples will be sent to Georgetown
University-Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center for processing and storage. An optional
pretreatment biopsy of an accessible tumor lesion will be performed in a subset of enrolled
patients. Patients will receive nivolumab in combination with ipilimumab according to the
standard FDA approved treatment regimen.
melanoma (cohort B) eligible for treatment with nivolumab in combination with ipilimumab
followed by nivolumab therapy will submit tissue blocks from tumors of malignant melanoma for
histopathology review and immunohistochemistry analysis at Georgetown University-Lombardi
Comprehensive Cancer Center. Pretreatment blood will be drawn and stored in the Melanoma
Research Foundation Breakthrough Consortium Virtual Repository at each participating
institution. At the end of participation, samples will be sent to Georgetown
University-Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center for processing and storage. An optional
pretreatment biopsy of an accessible tumor lesion will be performed in a subset of enrolled
patients. Patients will receive nivolumab in combination with ipilimumab according to the
standard FDA approved treatment regimen.
Immunotherapy with HD-IL-2 has produced durable benefit in 10% of patients with metastatic
cutaneous melanoma. The antitumor activity of IL-2 has been limited at least in part by
immunosuppressive and immune-regulatory forces within the tumor microenvironment. Antibodies
against CTLA4 (e.g. ipilimumab), PD1 and its ligand (PD-L1) produced long-term benefit in
approximately 20-40% of patients with advanced melanoma. In addition, the combination of
ipilimumab with the anti-PD1 antibody, nivolumab, has shown tumor responses in up to 60% of
patients with advanced melanoma. These findings have led to FDA approval of ipilimumab and
nivolumab as an indication for treatment of patients with advanced melanoma and nivolumab for
other cancers. While these data are exciting, only a few patients enrolled to the prior
studies had metastatic MCM or ALM. There is no prospective immunotherapy studies conducted in
MCM or ALM-specific population. Therefore the activity of the ipilimumab + nivolumab
combination in these subsets or patients remains unknown
Reliable predictive biomarkers for the use of immune checkpoint inhibitors are needed to
identify pretreatment those patients most likely to respond and early on in treatment assays
could help identify mechanisms of tumor response and resistance necessary to improve therapy.
Although tumor PD-L1 expression in tumor confers higher treatment response rate, responses to
nivolumab or nivolumab + ipilimumab alone were noted in 55% and 41% of patients,
respectively, with PD-L1- tumors. Therefore, more reliable predictive biomarkers are needed.
Recently, extensive studies on metastatic colorectal cancer have demonstrated that a new
scoring system as well as density of immune cells infiltrates at the center of the tumor and
its invasive margin, described as Immunoscore, could accurately separate a group of patients
with high Immunoscore with improved DFS, and OS from those with low Immunoscore where the
histopathological staging system cannot. A recent study has also demonstrated relationship
between degree of pre-treatment CD8+ tumor infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) infiltration and
PD-L1 expression at the invasive margin of the advanced cutaneous melanoma and improved
long-term clinical benefits in patients with advanced melanoma who received pembrolizumab
monotherapy. Further, there appeared to be an association between tumor response and
clonality of the immune infiltrate based on a next-generation sequencing method used to
evaluate T-cell receptor rearrangement pre- and in response to checkpoint inhibitor therapy.
Also, high mutational burden correlated with overall survival in patients with cutaneous
melanoma treated with ipilimumab or lung cancer treated with anti-PD1. However, the biology
of MCM and ALM are distinct from cutaneous melanoma at multiple levels. Consequently, the
utility of predictive biomarkers developed for cutaneous melanoma remains unknown.
cutaneous melanoma. The antitumor activity of IL-2 has been limited at least in part by
immunosuppressive and immune-regulatory forces within the tumor microenvironment. Antibodies
against CTLA4 (e.g. ipilimumab), PD1 and its ligand (PD-L1) produced long-term benefit in
approximately 20-40% of patients with advanced melanoma. In addition, the combination of
ipilimumab with the anti-PD1 antibody, nivolumab, has shown tumor responses in up to 60% of
patients with advanced melanoma. These findings have led to FDA approval of ipilimumab and
nivolumab as an indication for treatment of patients with advanced melanoma and nivolumab for
other cancers. While these data are exciting, only a few patients enrolled to the prior
studies had metastatic MCM or ALM. There is no prospective immunotherapy studies conducted in
MCM or ALM-specific population. Therefore the activity of the ipilimumab + nivolumab
combination in these subsets or patients remains unknown
Reliable predictive biomarkers for the use of immune checkpoint inhibitors are needed to
identify pretreatment those patients most likely to respond and early on in treatment assays
could help identify mechanisms of tumor response and resistance necessary to improve therapy.
Although tumor PD-L1 expression in tumor confers higher treatment response rate, responses to
nivolumab or nivolumab + ipilimumab alone were noted in 55% and 41% of patients,
respectively, with PD-L1- tumors. Therefore, more reliable predictive biomarkers are needed.
Recently, extensive studies on metastatic colorectal cancer have demonstrated that a new
scoring system as well as density of immune cells infiltrates at the center of the tumor and
its invasive margin, described as Immunoscore, could accurately separate a group of patients
with high Immunoscore with improved DFS, and OS from those with low Immunoscore where the
histopathological staging system cannot. A recent study has also demonstrated relationship
between degree of pre-treatment CD8+ tumor infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) infiltration and
PD-L1 expression at the invasive margin of the advanced cutaneous melanoma and improved
long-term clinical benefits in patients with advanced melanoma who received pembrolizumab
monotherapy. Further, there appeared to be an association between tumor response and
clonality of the immune infiltrate based on a next-generation sequencing method used to
evaluate T-cell receptor rearrangement pre- and in response to checkpoint inhibitor therapy.
Also, high mutational burden correlated with overall survival in patients with cutaneous
melanoma treated with ipilimumab or lung cancer treated with anti-PD1. However, the biology
of MCM and ALM are distinct from cutaneous melanoma at multiple levels. Consequently, the
utility of predictive biomarkers developed for cutaneous melanoma remains unknown.
Inclusion Criteria:
- Patients must have histologically confirmed MCM or ALM that is metastatic or
unresectable.
- Patients must be eligible to receive nivolumab in combination with ipilimumab
treatment per institutional guidelines.
- Patients must have a tissue block (or 20 unstained slides) available with adequate
tumor to perform multiplex immunohistochemistry and nucleic acids analyses ( i.e.
whole exome sequencing) Patients with only a previous fine-needle aspirate are
ineligible for enrollment.
- Patients must be willing to donate a small amount of whole blood prior to treatment
and during treatment for laboratory analysis.
- Patients must give informed consent prior to initiation of therapy.
- Patients must be ambulatory with good performance status (ECOG 0 or 1)
Exclusion Criteria:
- Patients who do not have available tissue for immunohistochemistry and nucleic acids
analyses.
- Patients who have received prior immunotherapy for unresectable or metastatic disease.
- Patients with untreated brain metastases, leptomeningeal disease, or seizure disorders
are ineligible. Patients with a history of brain metastases must have completed
treatment (i.e. surgery or radiation) 1 month prior to enrollment and have no evidence
of disease or edema on brain CT or head MRI.
- Patients with inadequate tissue for analysis.
We found this trial at
4
sites
Hackensack, New Jersey 07601
Principal Investigator: Andrew Pecora, MD
Phone: 551-996-5809
Click here to add this to my saved trials
12902 USF Magnolia Dr
Tampa, Florida 33612
Tampa, Florida 33612
(888) 663-3488
Principal Investigator: Zeynep Eroglu, MD
Phone: 813-745-5170
H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center & Research Institute Moffitt Cancer Center in Tampa, Florida, has...
Click here to add this to my saved trials
Click here to add this to my saved trials
Washington, District of Columbia 20010
Principal Investigator: Suthee Rapisuwon, MD
Phone: 202-877-3061
Click here to add this to my saved trials