Wound Infiltration of Liposomal Bupivacaine v Plain Bupivacaine for Post-Op Pain Control in Elective Cesarean Delivery
Status: | Recruiting |
---|---|
Conditions: | Post-Surgical Pain |
Therapuetic Areas: | Musculoskeletal |
Healthy: | No |
Age Range: | 18 - Any |
Updated: | 1/20/2018 |
Start Date: | October 18, 2017 |
End Date: | February 18, 2019 |
Contact: | Brian M Fitzgerald, MD |
Email: | brian.m.fitzgerald.mil@mail.mil |
Phone: | 210-916-8666 |
A Comparison of Post-Incisional Wound Infiltration of Liposomal Bupivacaine to Plain Bupivacaine for Post-Operative Pain Control in Elective Cesarean Delivery: A Randomized Double Blind Placebo Controlled Trial
Randomized double blind placebo controlled trial to compare the post-operative pain control
advantages of post-incisional wound infiltration with liposomal bupivacaine to plain
bupivacaine in patients presenting for elective caesarean delivery.
advantages of post-incisional wound infiltration with liposomal bupivacaine to plain
bupivacaine in patients presenting for elective caesarean delivery.
Participants will include women with uncomplicated singleton pregnancies, ≥37 weeks
gestation, ≥18 years old presenting and presenting for elective caesarean delivery with a
planned spinal anesthetic with a standardized amount of intrathecal morphine (ITM). Exclusion
criteria include patients: not receiving a spinal anesthetic, receiving a spinal anesthetic
that required supplemental intraoperative pain medications (ketamine, epidural narcotics,
intravenous narcotics, etc), on chronic opioids, American Society of Anesthesiologist (ASA)
physical status class III or higher (Note: An ASA I patient is defined as a normal healthy
patient, an ASA II patient is defined as a patient with mild systemic disease and any patient
that with severe systemic disease or a disease that is incapacitating would be classified as
an ASA III or higher) or those that have known hypersensitivity to bupivacaine hydrochloride,
amide-type local anesthetics, or any component of the formation, and any subject with hepatic
or renal impairment.
A three-arm study will be used: (a) control group (placebo of normal saline) (b) plain
bupivacaine group and (c) liposomal bupivacaine group. After patients receive their spinal
anesthetic and as the Pfannenstiel incision is being closed, an equal volume (20ml,
administered via two 10ml syringes) of one of the three solutions will be infiltrated into
the wound by the obstetrician team in a standardized fashion.
gestation, ≥18 years old presenting and presenting for elective caesarean delivery with a
planned spinal anesthetic with a standardized amount of intrathecal morphine (ITM). Exclusion
criteria include patients: not receiving a spinal anesthetic, receiving a spinal anesthetic
that required supplemental intraoperative pain medications (ketamine, epidural narcotics,
intravenous narcotics, etc), on chronic opioids, American Society of Anesthesiologist (ASA)
physical status class III or higher (Note: An ASA I patient is defined as a normal healthy
patient, an ASA II patient is defined as a patient with mild systemic disease and any patient
that with severe systemic disease or a disease that is incapacitating would be classified as
an ASA III or higher) or those that have known hypersensitivity to bupivacaine hydrochloride,
amide-type local anesthetics, or any component of the formation, and any subject with hepatic
or renal impairment.
A three-arm study will be used: (a) control group (placebo of normal saline) (b) plain
bupivacaine group and (c) liposomal bupivacaine group. After patients receive their spinal
anesthetic and as the Pfannenstiel incision is being closed, an equal volume (20ml,
administered via two 10ml syringes) of one of the three solutions will be infiltrated into
the wound by the obstetrician team in a standardized fashion.
Inclusion Criteria:
1. ASA I or II women with uncomplicated singleton pregnancies
2. ≥37 weeks gestation
3. ≥18 years old presenting
4. Presenting for elective caesarean delivery with a planned spinal anesthetic with a
standardized amount of intrathecal morphine (ITM).
5. Able to provide informed consent.
Exclusion Criteria:
1. Subject is not a candidate for a spinal anesthetic
2. Subject receives a spinal anesthetic that required supplemental intraoperative pain
medications (ketamine, epidural local anesthetic, epidural narcotics, intravenous
narcotics, etc)
3. Subject is on chronic opioids.
4. Subject is an ASA class III or higher.
5. Subject has a known hypersensitivity to bupivacaine hydrochloride, amide-type local
anesthetics, or any component of the formation,
6. Subject has hepatic or renal impairment that is concerning, as determined by the
surgeon or anesthesiologist.
We found this trial at
1
site
3551 Roger Brooke Dr
Fort Sam Houston, Texas 78234
Fort Sam Houston, Texas 78234
(210) 916-4141
Phone: 210-916-8666
Brooke Army Medical Center Brooke Army Medical Center (BAMC) is the Flagship of Army Medicine!...
Click here to add this to my saved trials