Improve Glaucoma Medication Adherence
Status: | Recruiting |
---|---|
Conditions: | Ocular |
Therapuetic Areas: | Ophthalmology |
Healthy: | No |
Age Range: | 18 - Any |
Updated: | 3/17/2019 |
Start Date: | August 9, 2017 |
End Date: | March 1, 2021 |
Contact: | Miriam Kirshner, MSW |
Email: | Miriam.Kirshner@va.gov |
Phone: | (919) 286-0411 |
Improving Glaucoma Medication Adherence
The proposed study is a randomized controlled trial enrolling Veterans with medically treated
glaucoma who report less than 100% adherence to the prescribed glaucoma therapy. Participants
will be randomized to receive either a one-on-one session with a member of the research team
discussing the disease process and strategies for administering eye drops (intervention) or a
one-on-one session with a member of the research team discussing general eye health
(control). All participants will be provided with a "smart bottle" to house their glaucoma
medications. The smart bottle records the date and time that the bottle is opened. For
participants in the intervention arm only, a reminder function will be activated. The
proportion or prescribed doses taken according to the monitor will be compared for the two
groups.
glaucoma who report less than 100% adherence to the prescribed glaucoma therapy. Participants
will be randomized to receive either a one-on-one session with a member of the research team
discussing the disease process and strategies for administering eye drops (intervention) or a
one-on-one session with a member of the research team discussing general eye health
(control). All participants will be provided with a "smart bottle" to house their glaucoma
medications. The smart bottle records the date and time that the bottle is opened. For
participants in the intervention arm only, a reminder function will be activated. The
proportion or prescribed doses taken according to the monitor will be compared for the two
groups.
The purpose if this study is to improve glaucoma medication adherence in Veterans with
medically-treated glaucoma. The study design is a single-site randomized controlled trial.
Specific Aim 1. Evaluate the impact of an intervention to improve glaucoma medication
adherence among Veterans at 6-month follow up.
Hypothesis 1: Veterans randomized to the intervention will have a greater proportion of
prescribed glaucoma medication doses taken as measured by the electronic medication monitor
in the 6 months following the intervention compared to Veterans randomized to the control
arm.
The primary outcome for hypothesis 1A is the proportion of prescribed doses taken according
to the electronic monitor. Participants in both arms will receive the electronic monitor or
"smart bottle," which wirelessly transmits the date and time of opening of the smart bottle
to the study team. From these medication events, the proportion of prescribed doses will be
derived, defined as the ratio of the number of times the smart bottle was opened to the
required number of doses prescribed according to the medical record over the period of time
that the bottle is in use. For example, if a participant is advised to take his or her
glaucoma drop twice a day for the 180 days that the bottle is in use and the smart bottle
reveals 135 openings over the same time period, the proportion of prescribed doses taken is
37.5%.
Specific Aim 2. Evaluate the impact of the intervention on intensification of glaucoma
therapy among Veterans at 12-month follow-up.
Hypothesis 2: The proportion of Veterans in the intervention arm that are prescribed more
intensive glaucoma therapy, defined as addition of adjuvant glaucoma medication or
recommendation for laser or glaucoma surgery will be less than the proportion of Veterans in
the control arm who are prescribed more intensive glaucoma therapy in the 12 months following
the intervention.
Baseline data collection will include cataloging the current glaucoma medication regimen
prescribed to the participant. Chart abstractions will be performed at 12 months following
the baseline visit and intensification of glaucoma therapy will be defined as either 1) the
addition of another glaucoma medication to the baseline regimen, 2) recommendation for
glaucoma laser treatment, or 3) recommendation for glaucoma surgery in the 12 months
following the baseline visit . The investigators will collect these data at 12 months because
the Metrics study suggested that 55% of participants in the control arm will have
intensification of therapy within one year.
Specific Aim 3. Evaluate the incremental cost-effectiveness and budget and workflow impacts
of the intervention compared to usual care.
Hypothesis 3: The intervention will be cost-effectiveness for the following ratios: 1) cost
per percentage improvement in medication adherence; 2) cost per blindness averted; and 3)
cost per quality-adjusted-life years saved.
A direct measurement approach will be used to estimate per-patient intervention and control
arm costs. Glaucoma-related health care utilization costs will be derived from VA
administrative datasets. The cost estimates will be combined with observed improvement in
medication adherence and reduction in escalation in therapy to estimate the first two
incremental cost effectiveness ratios. Simulation using Markov modeling will be used to
estimate the incremental cost per blindness averted and quality-adjusted life years (QALYs)
gained. Cost estimates and labor time data collected will be combined with glaucoma
prevalence rates among Veterans to estimate overall budget and workload impacts to the VA
healthcare system.
medically-treated glaucoma. The study design is a single-site randomized controlled trial.
Specific Aim 1. Evaluate the impact of an intervention to improve glaucoma medication
adherence among Veterans at 6-month follow up.
Hypothesis 1: Veterans randomized to the intervention will have a greater proportion of
prescribed glaucoma medication doses taken as measured by the electronic medication monitor
in the 6 months following the intervention compared to Veterans randomized to the control
arm.
The primary outcome for hypothesis 1A is the proportion of prescribed doses taken according
to the electronic monitor. Participants in both arms will receive the electronic monitor or
"smart bottle," which wirelessly transmits the date and time of opening of the smart bottle
to the study team. From these medication events, the proportion of prescribed doses will be
derived, defined as the ratio of the number of times the smart bottle was opened to the
required number of doses prescribed according to the medical record over the period of time
that the bottle is in use. For example, if a participant is advised to take his or her
glaucoma drop twice a day for the 180 days that the bottle is in use and the smart bottle
reveals 135 openings over the same time period, the proportion of prescribed doses taken is
37.5%.
Specific Aim 2. Evaluate the impact of the intervention on intensification of glaucoma
therapy among Veterans at 12-month follow-up.
Hypothesis 2: The proportion of Veterans in the intervention arm that are prescribed more
intensive glaucoma therapy, defined as addition of adjuvant glaucoma medication or
recommendation for laser or glaucoma surgery will be less than the proportion of Veterans in
the control arm who are prescribed more intensive glaucoma therapy in the 12 months following
the intervention.
Baseline data collection will include cataloging the current glaucoma medication regimen
prescribed to the participant. Chart abstractions will be performed at 12 months following
the baseline visit and intensification of glaucoma therapy will be defined as either 1) the
addition of another glaucoma medication to the baseline regimen, 2) recommendation for
glaucoma laser treatment, or 3) recommendation for glaucoma surgery in the 12 months
following the baseline visit . The investigators will collect these data at 12 months because
the Metrics study suggested that 55% of participants in the control arm will have
intensification of therapy within one year.
Specific Aim 3. Evaluate the incremental cost-effectiveness and budget and workflow impacts
of the intervention compared to usual care.
Hypothesis 3: The intervention will be cost-effectiveness for the following ratios: 1) cost
per percentage improvement in medication adherence; 2) cost per blindness averted; and 3)
cost per quality-adjusted-life years saved.
A direct measurement approach will be used to estimate per-patient intervention and control
arm costs. Glaucoma-related health care utilization costs will be derived from VA
administrative datasets. The cost estimates will be combined with observed improvement in
medication adherence and reduction in escalation in therapy to estimate the first two
incremental cost effectiveness ratios. Simulation using Markov modeling will be used to
estimate the incremental cost per blindness averted and quality-adjusted life years (QALYs)
gained. Cost estimates and labor time data collected will be combined with glaucoma
prevalence rates among Veterans to estimate overall budget and workload impacts to the VA
healthcare system.
Inclusion Criteria:
- Diagnosis of open angle glaucoma [primary open angle glaucoma, pigment dispersion
glaucoma, pseudoexfoliation glaucoma, combined mechanism glaucoma, low tension
glaucoma] recorded in the medical record
- Prescribed glaucoma eye drops,
- Visual field performed within the last 9 months.
- As visual field testing is standard care glaucoma and the investigators wish to
establish baseline glaucoma severity, the investigators will require that
subjects have a visual field test documented in the chart within 9 months of
enrollment.
Exclusion Criteria:
Exclusion criteria for patients At Screener:
- "How confident are you that you always remember to use your glaucoma medications?"
- not at all confident
- somewhat confident
- very confident)
- And "In the past 4 weeks, did you ever forget to take your medicine?"
- Veterans who respond both "very confident" and "no", respectively, will be
excluded
Inclusion criteria for companions at screener:
- Willing to participate in assisting the patient with glaucoma drops and
- Willing to accompany the patient to the intervention visit for participants in the
intervention arm or eye health education visit for participants in the control arm.
Exclusion criteria for companions: Unable or unwilling to attend baseline visit and
intervention or control arm educational session with patient participant.
Exclusion criteria for patients or companions:
- Lacks proficiency in English,
- Lacks either a cell phone or landline phone.
Exclusion criteria for patients post randomization:
- Decision by patient and provider to cease glaucoma medication use
- Change in functional status such that the drops are no longer administered by the
patient or the companion (such as nursing home care)
We found this trial at
1
site
Click here to add this to my saved trials