Task-specificity for Locomotor Recovery Following SCI
| Status: | Recruiting |
|---|---|
| Conditions: | Hospital, Orthopedic |
| Therapuetic Areas: | Orthopedics / Podiatry, Other |
| Healthy: | No |
| Age Range: | 18 - 75 |
| Updated: | 2/11/2018 |
| Start Date: | July 1, 2017 |
| End Date: | September 30, 2019 |
| Contact: | Thomas G Hornby |
| Email: | tghornby@iu.edu |
| Phone: | 3123508291 |
The primary goal of the proposed study is to identify the contributions of the amount of
task-specific practice on locomotor (i.e., walking) recovery in patients with chronic (> 1
yr) motor incomplete spinal cord injury (iSCI). Consistent with principles of motor learning
and exercise physiology, the investigators contend that certain training (i.e., dosage)
parameters of physical rehabilitation are critical to mobility outcomes following
neurological injury. Specifically, the specificity, amount and intensity of physical
interventions (i.e., practice) may influence specific outcomes in the patient population
treated. In ambulatory patients with iSCI, there are very few studies that have controlled
for or targeted these training variables or their influence on locomotor recovery. Previous
work suggests these training parameters may influence locomotor recovery in patients with
other neurological disorders (i.e., stroke), although few studies have attempted to delineate
similar contributions of in iSCI. Indeed, no studies have carefully controlled the amount of
task-specific practice during physical rehabilitation of patients with iSCI, and such
interventions are rarely utilized in the clinical setting. The goal of the present study is
to delineate the relative contributions of amount of task-specific training on locomotor
outcomes in individuals with iSCI. Using a cross-over, randomized clinical trial design, the
investigators anticipated non-specific (i.e., non-stepping) training activities would result
in smaller improvements as compared to task-specific (stepping) training. The investigators
will investigate the effects of such training on walking performance and kinematics, as well
as the impairments thought to contribute to walking performance. Successful completion of
this project could have an immediate impact on rehabilitation research and treatment of
people following iSCI, and may be utilized to treat more subacute patients with iSCI or other
acute-onset neurological disorders.
task-specific practice on locomotor (i.e., walking) recovery in patients with chronic (> 1
yr) motor incomplete spinal cord injury (iSCI). Consistent with principles of motor learning
and exercise physiology, the investigators contend that certain training (i.e., dosage)
parameters of physical rehabilitation are critical to mobility outcomes following
neurological injury. Specifically, the specificity, amount and intensity of physical
interventions (i.e., practice) may influence specific outcomes in the patient population
treated. In ambulatory patients with iSCI, there are very few studies that have controlled
for or targeted these training variables or their influence on locomotor recovery. Previous
work suggests these training parameters may influence locomotor recovery in patients with
other neurological disorders (i.e., stroke), although few studies have attempted to delineate
similar contributions of in iSCI. Indeed, no studies have carefully controlled the amount of
task-specific practice during physical rehabilitation of patients with iSCI, and such
interventions are rarely utilized in the clinical setting. The goal of the present study is
to delineate the relative contributions of amount of task-specific training on locomotor
outcomes in individuals with iSCI. Using a cross-over, randomized clinical trial design, the
investigators anticipated non-specific (i.e., non-stepping) training activities would result
in smaller improvements as compared to task-specific (stepping) training. The investigators
will investigate the effects of such training on walking performance and kinematics, as well
as the impairments thought to contribute to walking performance. Successful completion of
this project could have an immediate impact on rehabilitation research and treatment of
people following iSCI, and may be utilized to treat more subacute patients with iSCI or other
acute-onset neurological disorders.
The primary goal of the proposed study is to identify the contributions of the amount of
task-specific practice on locomotor (i.e., walking) recovery in patients with chronic (> 1
yr) motor incomplete spinal cord injury (iSCI). The investigators will do this by building on
previous work directed towards identifying the essential exercise training parameters that
maximize locomotor recovery. Consistent with principles of motor learning and exercise
physiology, the investigators contend that certain training (i.e., dosage) parameters of
physical rehabilitation, including the type (specificity) and amount of task practice, are
critical to mobility outcomes following neurological injury. Previous work suggests these
training parameters may influence locomotor recovery in patients with other neurological
disorders (i.e., stroke), although few studies have attempted to delineate similar
contributions of amount of task-specific practice in iSCI. Indeed, no studies have carefully
controlled these training parameters during physical rehabilitation of patients with iSCI,
and such interventions are rarely utilized in the clinical setting.
Reasons for these knowledge gaps from other rehabilitation studies to patients with iSCI or
lack of clinical implementation are unclear, but may be due to adherence to traditional
rehabilitation theories. One concern is that practicing only stepping tasks reduces attention
towards hallmark physical impairments following iSCI, such as loss of strength or postural
stability, which are considered primary determinants of decreased mobility. Only a few
studies have addressed whether providing only structured stepping training can mitigate these
impairments without their explicit practice, but not in the iSCI population. A related
concern is that focused stepping training without significant attention towards impairments
or gait quality may exaggerate altered movement strategies, which could be reinforced with
repeated practice. However, there is little data to suggest "worsening" of abnormal gait
patterns following high intensity training. Rather, recent findings suggest patients
demonstrate more normal kinematics. If focused task specific (i.e., stepping) training is to
be applied clinically, the investigators must delineate its contributions towards improving
locomotor function, and their effects on underlying impairments and gait kinematics.
The central hypotheses are that stepping training in iSCI results in:1) greater locomotor
gains as compared to non-specific interventions; 2) gains in selected impairments underlying
gait dysfunction (i.e., strength and metabolic capacity and efficiency); and, 3) improvements
in gait quality. To test these hypotheses, the proposed crossover, assessor-blinded,
randomized clinical trial (RCT) is designed to test the effects of specificity of
rehabilitation training applied early-post-stroke. In this RCT, patients > 1 year post-iSCI
will be allocated to 4-6 weeks (20 session) of high-intensity stepping training or
high-intensity non-specific training. Importantly, training intensity will be held constant
to account for this potential confounding factor. Blinded assessments will be performed prior
to and following each training paradigm. The investigators will address 3 specific aims:
Specific Aim 1: Demonstrate that high intensity stepping training in patients with chronic
iSCI produces greater locomotor gains as compared to high intensity non-specific training
strategies.
Hypothesis 1: High intensity stepping training will result in greater increases in gait
speeds and distances Specific Aim 2: Test the effects of these training strategies on
impairments and non-locomotor mobility tasks.
Hypothesis 2: Higher intensity stepping training groups will result in greater gains in
metabolic capacity and efficiency.
Specific Aim 3: Analyze the potential effects of high intensity stepping or non-specific
training on gait quality.
Hypothesis 3: High intensity training will result in improved sagittal-plane gait kinematics
consistent with normal locomotor function, due in part to greater locomotor speeds, as
compared to non-specific training strategies.
The aims represent an innovative approach to improving long-term mobility outcomes of
patients with iSCI by applying selected principles of motor learning and exercise physiology
yet untested in this population. Expected outcomes will be demonstration of the efficacy of a
high intensity stepping training paradigm, with further understanding of potential underlying
mechanisms and movement strategies used with improved locomotor performance. Successful
completion of this project could have an immediate impact on rehabilitation research and
treatment of people following iSCI, and may be utilized to treat more subacute patients with
iSCI
task-specific practice on locomotor (i.e., walking) recovery in patients with chronic (> 1
yr) motor incomplete spinal cord injury (iSCI). The investigators will do this by building on
previous work directed towards identifying the essential exercise training parameters that
maximize locomotor recovery. Consistent with principles of motor learning and exercise
physiology, the investigators contend that certain training (i.e., dosage) parameters of
physical rehabilitation, including the type (specificity) and amount of task practice, are
critical to mobility outcomes following neurological injury. Previous work suggests these
training parameters may influence locomotor recovery in patients with other neurological
disorders (i.e., stroke), although few studies have attempted to delineate similar
contributions of amount of task-specific practice in iSCI. Indeed, no studies have carefully
controlled these training parameters during physical rehabilitation of patients with iSCI,
and such interventions are rarely utilized in the clinical setting.
Reasons for these knowledge gaps from other rehabilitation studies to patients with iSCI or
lack of clinical implementation are unclear, but may be due to adherence to traditional
rehabilitation theories. One concern is that practicing only stepping tasks reduces attention
towards hallmark physical impairments following iSCI, such as loss of strength or postural
stability, which are considered primary determinants of decreased mobility. Only a few
studies have addressed whether providing only structured stepping training can mitigate these
impairments without their explicit practice, but not in the iSCI population. A related
concern is that focused stepping training without significant attention towards impairments
or gait quality may exaggerate altered movement strategies, which could be reinforced with
repeated practice. However, there is little data to suggest "worsening" of abnormal gait
patterns following high intensity training. Rather, recent findings suggest patients
demonstrate more normal kinematics. If focused task specific (i.e., stepping) training is to
be applied clinically, the investigators must delineate its contributions towards improving
locomotor function, and their effects on underlying impairments and gait kinematics.
The central hypotheses are that stepping training in iSCI results in:1) greater locomotor
gains as compared to non-specific interventions; 2) gains in selected impairments underlying
gait dysfunction (i.e., strength and metabolic capacity and efficiency); and, 3) improvements
in gait quality. To test these hypotheses, the proposed crossover, assessor-blinded,
randomized clinical trial (RCT) is designed to test the effects of specificity of
rehabilitation training applied early-post-stroke. In this RCT, patients > 1 year post-iSCI
will be allocated to 4-6 weeks (20 session) of high-intensity stepping training or
high-intensity non-specific training. Importantly, training intensity will be held constant
to account for this potential confounding factor. Blinded assessments will be performed prior
to and following each training paradigm. The investigators will address 3 specific aims:
Specific Aim 1: Demonstrate that high intensity stepping training in patients with chronic
iSCI produces greater locomotor gains as compared to high intensity non-specific training
strategies.
Hypothesis 1: High intensity stepping training will result in greater increases in gait
speeds and distances Specific Aim 2: Test the effects of these training strategies on
impairments and non-locomotor mobility tasks.
Hypothesis 2: Higher intensity stepping training groups will result in greater gains in
metabolic capacity and efficiency.
Specific Aim 3: Analyze the potential effects of high intensity stepping or non-specific
training on gait quality.
Hypothesis 3: High intensity training will result in improved sagittal-plane gait kinematics
consistent with normal locomotor function, due in part to greater locomotor speeds, as
compared to non-specific training strategies.
The aims represent an innovative approach to improving long-term mobility outcomes of
patients with iSCI by applying selected principles of motor learning and exercise physiology
yet untested in this population. Expected outcomes will be demonstration of the efficacy of a
high intensity stepping training paradigm, with further understanding of potential underlying
mechanisms and movement strategies used with improved locomotor performance. Successful
completion of this project could have an immediate impact on rehabilitation research and
treatment of people following iSCI, and may be utilized to treat more subacute patients with
iSCI
Inclusion Criteria:
- individuals with chronic (>1 yr duration) motor iSCI at the level or T10 (anatomical)
or above
- ages 18-75 years
- ability to walk without physical assistance but with below-knee braces and assistive
devices as needed
- self-selected gait speeds between 0.01-1.0 m/s.
- not currently receiving physical therapy
Exclusion Criteria:
- uncontrolled cardiopulmonary or metabolic disease that limits exercise participation
- active heterotopic ossification
- recurrent history of lower extremity fractures
- previous orthopedic or other peripheral or central neurological injury that may impair
locomotor function
- history of botulinum toxin injection < 3 months prior
- Patients who are prescribed intrathecal or oral anti-spastics should agree to limit
changes in anti-spastic use throughout the training and testing period.
We found this trial at
1
site
Click here to add this to my saved trials
