Comparison of the Safety and Efficacy of Intravenous Iron Versus Oral Iron in the Treatment of Anemia Secondary to Heavy Uterine Bleeding
| Status: | Completed |
|---|---|
| Conditions: | Women's Studies, Anemia |
| Therapuetic Areas: | Hematology, Reproductive |
| Healthy: | No |
| Age Range: | 18 - Any |
| Updated: | 2/22/2018 |
| Start Date: | May 2005 |
| End Date: | June 2006 |
Comparison of the Safety and Efficacy of Intravenous Iron vs Oral Iron in the Treatment of Anemia Secondary to Heavy Uterine Bleeding
This study compares of the safety and efficacy of intravenous iron vs oral iron in the
treatment of anemia secondary to heavy uterine bleeding
treatment of anemia secondary to heavy uterine bleeding
This is an open-label, randomized, Phase III, active-control, study of the efficacy and
safety of IV iron vs oral iron in patients with anemia secondary to heavy uterine bleeding.
safety of IV iron vs oral iron in patients with anemia secondary to heavy uterine bleeding.
Inclusion Criteria:
- Female subjects >/= 18 years of age
- History of Heavy uterine bleeding
- Hgb
- Practicing acceptable birth control
- Demonstrate ability to understand and comply with protocol
Exclusion Criteria:
- Known Hypersensitivity to oral or IV iron
- Anemia other than iron deficiency anemia
- Iron storage disorders
- Initiation of treatment that may effect degree of heavy uterine bleeding
- Anticipated need for surgery
- Severe psychiatric disorder
- Active infection
- Positive Pregnancy test
- Known Hep B or C or Active Hepatitis
- Received investigational Drug within 30 days
- Alcohol or drug abuse
We found this trial at
1
site
Click here to add this to my saved trials
