PEAK Platelet Rich Plasma Injection Treatment for Chronic Lateral Epicondylosis



Status:Recruiting
Healthy:No
Age Range:18 - 65
Updated:3/2/2019
Start Date:May 2016
End Date:December 2020
Contact:John J. Wilson, MD, MS
Email:wilson@ortho.wisc.edu
Phone:608-440-6543

Use our guide to learn which trials are right for you!

The Clinical, Biomechanical, and Tissue Regenerating Effects of a Single PEAK Platelet Rich Plasma Injection for the Treatment of Chronic Lateral Epicondylosis: a Randomized Controlled Trial

The proposed project will be the first to assess pain- and function-dependent, elbow-specific
quality of life and in-vivo mechanical properties of common extensor tendons post-treatment
with PRP in a Level 1, RCT with subject and assessor blinding. The valuable data gained will
significantly add to the knowledge base of treatment effects of PRP for a chronic
tendinopathy. Positive findings of PRP compared to control (corticosteroid injection) would
suggest future larger scale studies to help establish an optimal protocol for the nonsurgical
management of CLE. Correlating US and shear wave acoustoelastography imaging assessments with
validated clinical outcomes will provide a powerful tool for future outcomes analyses using a
non-invasive imaging modality to monitor tissue healing both morphologically as well as
biomechanically, and may even be used to evaluate injury risk.

Randomization procedures Subjects will be randomized to 1 of 2 study arms. Subjects in Group
1 (PRP) will receive a single ultrasound-guided intratendinous (common extensor tendon
origin) injection of up to 3 mL autologous PEAK platelet-rich plasma at week 0 (baseline).
Subjects in Group 2 (corticosteroid control) will receive a single ultrasound-guided
intratendinous injection approximately (may be limited by tendon/soft tissue limitations of
the subject) of 2 mL 1% lidocaine + 1mL of him 40mg Kenalog (triamcinolone hexacetonide,
40mg/mL) at week 0. If a subject has bilateral elbow common extensor tendon pain, both elbows
will be treated in the same study arm.

Blinding: Subjects and assessors will be blinded to the subject group allocation. Control
subjects will also undergo phlebotomy to maintain blinding. Injection syringes will be
cloaked using opaque adhesive tape in order to ensure the injector is unaware of subject
treatment allocation. Subjects will be identified to study personnel using a unique study
number only and results of the imaging studies will be blinded, batched and evaluated in a
randomized manner.

Ultrasound imaging analyses will be conducted at baseline, 26 weeks, and 52 weeks post
treatment.

The platelet concentration will be analyzed in both samples (whole blood compared to PRP) in
order to record and verify the consistency of the concentration factor in PRP.

Shear wave ultrasound imaging will be compared using comparison of average shear wave speed
(SWS) between baseline and post treatment 52 week follow-up between the two randomized
groups. Shear wave speed is a quantitative measure obtained by measuring speed of ultrasound
in a selected region of interest (ROI). In prior studies, the study team has successfully
blinded the investigator when selecting the ROI, and conducted inter-rater repeatability
analysis showing that this was a valid, repeatable way of measuring SWS in a particular ROI.

For patients:Total of 9 visits Initial Screen - Initial Eligibility Screening Baseline -
Informational Meeting: Secondary eligibility screen, enrollment (informed consent),
questionnaires; Grip Strength Test; Ultrasound and SWAE imaging Week 0 Intervention -
Injection of PRP under ultrasound Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16 - Questionnaires: QUICK-DASH, SF-12,
PRTEE, SANE-ELBOW, PRP Satisfaction; Grip Strength Test Week 26 - Questionnaires: QUICK-DASH,
SF-12, PRTEE, SANE-ELBOW, PRP Satisfaction; Grip Strength Test; Ultrasound and SWAE imaging
Week 52 - Questionnaires: QUICK-DASH, SF-12, PRTEE, SANE-ELBOW, PRP Satisfaction; Grip
Strength Test; Ultrasound and SWAE imaging

Inclusion Criteria:

1. age 18-65

2. chronic (>3months) unilateral or bilateral common extensor tendon pain

3. clinical exam findings consistent with CLE

4. imaging confirmation of CLE (U/S or MRI)

5. self-reported failure of supervised physical therapy; 6) self-reported failure of at
least 2 of the most common treatments (NSAIDs, relative rest, ice, bracing) for CLE.

Exclusion Criteria:

1. inability to comply with follow-up requirements of study

2. history of bleeding disorders, low-platelet counts, other hematologic conditions

3. elbow pain with other possible etiologies (e.g., degenerative joint disease)

4. currently using anticoagulation or immunosuppressive therapy

5. anticoagulant or immunosuppressive therapy within the prior month

6. known allergy to Lidocaine

7. self-reported pregnancy

8. worker's compensation injury

9. pending litigation

10. concurrent opioid use for pain

11. corticosteroid injection within the past 3 months

12. minors
We found this trial at
1
site
Madison, Wisconsin 53705
Principal Investigator: John J. Wilson, MD, MS
?
mi
from
Madison, WI
Click here to add this to my saved trials