Negative Pressure Wound Therapy vs Standard Care Dressing
| Status: | Recruiting |
|---|---|
| Conditions: | Hospital |
| Therapuetic Areas: | Other |
| Healthy: | No |
| Age Range: | 18 - 90 |
| Updated: | 3/9/2019 |
| Start Date: | April 28, 2018 |
| End Date: | April 20, 2019 |
| Contact: | Munier Nazzal |
| Email: | munier.nazzal@utoledo.edu |
| Phone: | 419-383-6810 |
A Comparison of Negative Pressure Wound Therapy vs Standard Care, for Vascular, Plastic and General Surgery
A comparison between the efficacy of negative pressure wound therapy and the efficacy of
standard care dressing
standard care dressing
The aim of our study is to compare the efficacy of negative pressure wound therapy (Prevena)
and standard clinical dressing in terms of prevention of postoperative surgical site
infection, length of hospital stay, and total cost of hospitalization among vascular, plastic
and general surgery patients.
and standard clinical dressing in terms of prevention of postoperative surgical site
infection, length of hospital stay, and total cost of hospitalization among vascular, plastic
and general surgery patients.
Inclusion Criteria:
- Consent for participation from the patient or his legal representative
Exclusion Criteria:
- Currently infected wounds
- Patients with history of immunosupression
- Pregnancy
We found this trial at
1
site
Click here to add this to my saved trials
