Promoting Recovery Optimization With WALKing Exercise After Stroke
Status: | Recruiting |
---|---|
Conditions: | Neurology |
Therapuetic Areas: | Neurology |
Healthy: | No |
Age Range: | 21 - 85 |
Updated: | 7/19/2018 |
Start Date: | July 2016 |
End Date: | June 2021 |
Contact: | Darcy Reisman, PT, PhD |
Email: | dreisman@udel.edu |
Phone: | 302-831-0508 |
Stroke survivors, as a group, are extremely inactive and this has serious consequences for
them, including an increased risk of a second stroke and developing other diseases. This
study investigates a novel intervention designed to improve everyday activity after stroke by
combining walking training to improve walking capacity with a program to encourage more daily
walking.
them, including an increased risk of a second stroke and developing other diseases. This
study investigates a novel intervention designed to improve everyday activity after stroke by
combining walking training to improve walking capacity with a program to encourage more daily
walking.
As a group, stroke survivors are more physically inactive than even the most sedentary older
adults. Lack of physical activity has serious consequences in persons with stroke, including
an increased risk of recurrent stroke, developing other diseases and mortality. Current
rehabilitation interventions do little to improve real-world walking activity after stroke,
suggesting that simply improving walking capacity is not sufficient for improving daily
physical activity after stroke. Rather, the investigator's hypothesize that the combination
of a fast walking intervention that improves walking capacity, with a step activity
monitoring program that facilitates translation of gains from the clinic to the "real-world",
would generate greater improvements in real world walking activity than with either
intervention alone. Data from the investigator's lab provides support for this hypothesis;
however, it suggests that the greater efficacy of combining the 2 interventions depends on a
participant's initial walking activity. Thus, the investigator's do not expect that one
intervention will be superior to the others for all participants, but rather that the
combined intervention will be superior for those with low levels of baseline walking
activity, speed and endurance. The specific objective of this study is to test whether and
for whom combining fast walking training with a step activity monitoring program (FAST+SAM)
is superior in improving real-world walking activity compared to fast walking training alone
(FAST) or a step activity monitoring and feedback program alone (SAM) in those with chronic
stroke. Using a randomized controlled experimental design, 225 chronic (> 6 months) stroke
survivors, will complete 12 weeks of fast walking training (FAST), a step activity monitoring
program (SAM) or a fast walking training + step activity monitoring program (FAST+SAM).
Moderation of specific intervention outcomes by baseline characteristics will be evaluated to
determine for whom the interventions are effective.
adults. Lack of physical activity has serious consequences in persons with stroke, including
an increased risk of recurrent stroke, developing other diseases and mortality. Current
rehabilitation interventions do little to improve real-world walking activity after stroke,
suggesting that simply improving walking capacity is not sufficient for improving daily
physical activity after stroke. Rather, the investigator's hypothesize that the combination
of a fast walking intervention that improves walking capacity, with a step activity
monitoring program that facilitates translation of gains from the clinic to the "real-world",
would generate greater improvements in real world walking activity than with either
intervention alone. Data from the investigator's lab provides support for this hypothesis;
however, it suggests that the greater efficacy of combining the 2 interventions depends on a
participant's initial walking activity. Thus, the investigator's do not expect that one
intervention will be superior to the others for all participants, but rather that the
combined intervention will be superior for those with low levels of baseline walking
activity, speed and endurance. The specific objective of this study is to test whether and
for whom combining fast walking training with a step activity monitoring program (FAST+SAM)
is superior in improving real-world walking activity compared to fast walking training alone
(FAST) or a step activity monitoring and feedback program alone (SAM) in those with chronic
stroke. Using a randomized controlled experimental design, 225 chronic (> 6 months) stroke
survivors, will complete 12 weeks of fast walking training (FAST), a step activity monitoring
program (SAM) or a fast walking training + step activity monitoring program (FAST+SAM).
Moderation of specific intervention outcomes by baseline characteristics will be evaluated to
determine for whom the interventions are effective.
Inclusion Criteria:
1. Age 21-85
2. Chronic stroke (>6 months post stroke)
3. Able to walk at self-selected speed without assistance from another person (assistive
devices are allowed)
4. Self-selected walking speed >0.3 m/s and <1.0 m/s
5. Average steps/day <8,000
6. Resting heart rate between 40-100 beats per minute
7. Resting blood pressure between 90/60 to 170/90.
Exclusion Criteria:
1. Evidence of cerebellar stroke
2. Other potentially disabling neurologic conditions in addition to stroke
3. Lower limb Botulinum toxin injection <4 months earlier
4. Current participation in physical therapy
5. Inability to walk outside the home prior to the stroke
6. Coronary artery bypass graft, stent placement or myocardial infarction within past 3
months
7. Musculoskeletal pain that limits activity
8. Inability to communicate with investigators
9. score >1 on question 1b and >0 on question 1c on the NIH Stroke Scale.
We found this trial at
1
site
Click here to add this to my saved trials