Restrictive Intravenous Fluids Trial in Sepsis



Status:Completed
Conditions:Hospital, Hospital, Hospital
Therapuetic Areas:Other
Healthy:No
Age Range:18 - Any
Updated:9/2/2018
Start Date:April 20, 2017
End Date:March 30, 2018

Use our guide to learn which trials are right for you!

Assessing Targeted Fluid Resuscitation Strategies Among Patients With Severe Sepsis and Septic Shock

IV fluid resuscitation has long been recognized to be an important treatment for patients
with severe sepsis and septic shock. While under-resuscitation is known to increase morbidity
and mortality, contemporary data suggests that overly aggressive fluid resuscitation may also
be harmful. Currently, following an initial IVF resuscitation of 30 ml/kg, there is no
standard of care and a lack of evidence to support a fluid restrictive or more liberal
strategy. The investigators seek to determine if a fluid restrictive strategy reduces
morbidity and mortality among patients with severe sepsis and septic shock.

Sepsis is one of the most common indications for intensive care unit admission world wide and
the third leading cause of death in the United States. While IV fluid administration has been
recognized as an important part of sepsis resuscitation for over 15 years, there is growing
concern that overly aggressive IV fluid resuscitation may be harmful to patients with severe
sepsis and septic shock.

The current standard of care for initial resuscitation is outlined in the 2016 Surviving
Sepsis guidelines which recommends a 30mL/kg bolus of IV fluid for septic patients with
hypotension (mean arterial pressure <65 mm Hg) or a lactic acid >4mmol/L within the first 3
hours of presentation. This standard is affirmed by the 2015 Centers for Medicare & Medicaid
(CMS) SEP-1 guidelines. Afterwards, the guidelines advise the use of vasopressors to maintain
a mean arterial pressure (MAP) of >65 mm Hg within the first 6 hours of patient care.
Following the initial 30mL/kg bolus, there is no established standard of care for fluid
administration; therefore there is significant variation in care between providers and
institutions. Currently, there is no human data that indicates that larger volume (>30mL/kg)
resuscitation strategy improves blood pressure or end organ perfusion , yet it is not
uncommon for patients to receive large volumes of IV fluid (5-10 liters) in the early stages
of resuscitation.

When considering how much IV fluids are typically administered to patients with septic shock,
examination of the large EGDT RCTs provides a more informed picture. In the original Rivers
study patients received approximately 70 mL/kg of IVF in the first 6 hours and additional 125
ml/kg in hours 7 to 72.3 Notably, this large volume resuscitation did not produce increased
rates of clinically important heart failure and intubation. In the contemporary EGDT
validation trials, patients received 60-70 ml/kg of IVF in the first 6 hours and only 60-70
ml/kg from hours 7 to 72.6,7,8 The contemporary alternative approach being advocated among
critical care practitioners is to use vasopressors to maintain a mean arterial pressures
above 65 mm Hg following the initial 30 ml/kg bolus, thereby maintaining organ perfusion,
while limiting further IV fluid administration.9 Without clear evidence to guide physicians
under current usual care the amount of IV fluid administration varies widely between
providers and institutions when resuscitating patients with severe sepsis and septic shock.

The investigators hypothesize the use of a fluid restrictive strategy will result in a lower
28-day mortality, ICU length of stay and total number of ventilator days but will not reduce
the number of patients who need hemodialysis or require intubation.

The primary outcome of the study is to assess if a restrictive IV fluid resuscitation
strategy has a composite benefit of a reduced discharge mortality or Persistent Organ
Dysfunction (POD) score compared to a usual care among patients with severe sepsis and septic
shock. POD is defined by the ongoing need for vasopressor agents such as norepinephrine,
epinephrine, vasopressin or dopamine for more than two hours in a given day; persistent renal
failure as defined by the need for any ongoing renal replacement therapy; and persistent
respiratory/neuromuscular failure as defined by the ongoing need for mechanical ventilation
(not including non-invasive ventilation modalities).

Inclusion Criteria:

1. The patients must be suspected by the treating physician to have sepsis causing their
acute illness as exhibited by 2 or more of the following Systemic Inflammatory
Response Syndrome (SIRS) criteria was well as a known or suspected infection at the
time of screening:

1. Temperature of > 38 C or < 36 C

2. Heart rate of > 90/min

3. Respiratory rate of > 20/min or PaCO2 < 32 mm Hg

4. White blood cell count > 12000/mm3 or < 4000/mm3 or >10% immature bands.

2. Since approximately 12% of patients ultimately diagnosed with sepsis do not meet SIRS
criteria , SIRS negative patients will be eligible for the study if the treating
physician makes a clinical diagnosis of severe sepsis or septic shock.

3. Patients must be suspected of having severe sepsis or septic shock defined as
refractory hypotension or a lactic acid>4 at the time of enrollment. Refractory
hypotension is defined as having a SBP <90 or MAP <65, for 15 minutes, following 1000
mL of IV fluid or a blood pressure maintained by vasopressor administration.

4. Patients must have received less than 60ml/kg of intravenous fluid at time of study
enrollment.

Exclusion Criteria:

1. Patients with a PRIMARY diagnosis of acute cerebral vascular event, acute coronary
syndrome, acute pulmonary edema, status asthmaticus, active gastrointestinal bleeding,
seizure, drug overdose, burn, trauma, requirement for immediate surgery, or undergoing
extracorporeal membrane oxygenation.

2. Patients who have a diagnosis of severe sepsis or septic shock and additionally have
an active fluid wasting process such as extensive diarrhea, diabetes insipidus,
cerebral salt wasting, or an osmotic diuresis.

3. Patients who have a diagnosis of severe sepsis or septic shock who have a concurrent
diagnosis of diabetic ketoacidosis, hyperosmolar non-ketotic hyperglycemia, or
rhabdomyolysis.

4. Patients who have received >60 ml/kg of IVF resuscitation.

5. Patient who are <18 years old, pregnant, or incarcerated.
We found this trial at
1
site
Providence, Rhode Island 02903
?
mi
from
Providence, RI
Click here to add this to my saved trials