Diabetes Engagement and Activation Platform
Status: | Completed |
---|---|
Conditions: | Diabetes |
Therapuetic Areas: | Endocrinology |
Healthy: | No |
Age Range: | 18 - 75 |
Updated: | 11/11/2018 |
Start Date: | November 1, 2017 |
End Date: | November 5, 2018 |
DEAP: Diabetes Engagement and Activation Platform
The following are hypothesized:
1. The Diabetes Engagement and Activation Platform (DEAP) can be integrated into primary
care workflow to facilitate the care of patients with type 2 diabetes.
2. The DEAP intervention will be feasible and acceptable to patients with type 2 diabetes.
3. The DEAP intervention will enhance patient activation and improve type 2 diabetes self
management and glucose control
1. The Diabetes Engagement and Activation Platform (DEAP) can be integrated into primary
care workflow to facilitate the care of patients with type 2 diabetes.
2. The DEAP intervention will be feasible and acceptable to patients with type 2 diabetes.
3. The DEAP intervention will enhance patient activation and improve type 2 diabetes self
management and glucose control
Aim 1: To evaluate how primary care practices adopt and integrate DEAP into routine workflow
including identification of barriers and facilitators to support acceptable, feasible, and
sustainable use of the system.
- Sub-aim 1.1: Measure the proportion of clinicians and care team members who engage
patients through the DEAP intervention as well as the types of patient support
activities they address; assess the representativeness of participating clinicians and
care team members in relation to all practice staff; and assess how they integrated DEAP
into the care of type 2 diabetes patients.
- Sub-aim 1.2: Assess how practices redesign workflow, overcome barriers, and enhance
facilitators in order to integrate DEAP.
- Sub-aim 1.3: Determine processes for sustaining DEAP beyond the project funding period .
Aim 2: To compare, relative to usual care, the effectiveness of the DEAP intervention.
- Sub Aim 2.1: Measure the proportion and representativeness of eligible patients who
choose to enroll; access the DEAP curriculum; complete the DEAP curriculum; and contact
care team members. .
- Sub Aim 2.2: Compare the change in the average glycosylated hemoglobin (primary
outcome), Body Mass Index, systolic blood pressure, and type 2 diabetes (T2D)
medications and patient activation (secondary outcomes) from baseline to 3 months and
from 3 to 6 months for patients randomized to DEAP versus usual care.
Sub Aim 2.3: Assess the clarity, readability and acceptability of the DEAP curricula
materials for T2D patients enrolled in the intervention.
including identification of barriers and facilitators to support acceptable, feasible, and
sustainable use of the system.
- Sub-aim 1.1: Measure the proportion of clinicians and care team members who engage
patients through the DEAP intervention as well as the types of patient support
activities they address; assess the representativeness of participating clinicians and
care team members in relation to all practice staff; and assess how they integrated DEAP
into the care of type 2 diabetes patients.
- Sub-aim 1.2: Assess how practices redesign workflow, overcome barriers, and enhance
facilitators in order to integrate DEAP.
- Sub-aim 1.3: Determine processes for sustaining DEAP beyond the project funding period .
Aim 2: To compare, relative to usual care, the effectiveness of the DEAP intervention.
- Sub Aim 2.1: Measure the proportion and representativeness of eligible patients who
choose to enroll; access the DEAP curriculum; complete the DEAP curriculum; and contact
care team members. .
- Sub Aim 2.2: Compare the change in the average glycosylated hemoglobin (primary
outcome), Body Mass Index, systolic blood pressure, and type 2 diabetes (T2D)
medications and patient activation (secondary outcomes) from baseline to 3 months and
from 3 to 6 months for patients randomized to DEAP versus usual care.
Sub Aim 2.3: Assess the clarity, readability and acceptability of the DEAP curricula
materials for T2D patients enrolled in the intervention.
Inclusion Criteria:
- Patients diagnosed with type 2 diabetes and A1C measure ≥ 8%;
- English speaking;
- Enrolled in the practice EHR linked patient portal.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Patients without type 2 diabetes or with type 2 diabetes who have a A1C less than or
equal to 7.9%;
- Non-English speaking;
- Patients not enrolled in the practice EHR linked patient portal;
- Under 18 and over 75 years of age.
We found this trial at
1
site
Virginia Commonwealth University Since our founding as a medical school in 1838, Virginia Commonwealth University...
Click here to add this to my saved trials