Gravity Versus Vacuum Based Indwelling Tunneled Pleural Drainage System
Status: | Recruiting |
---|---|
Conditions: | Pulmonary |
Therapuetic Areas: | Pulmonary / Respiratory Diseases |
Healthy: | No |
Age Range: | 18 - Any |
Updated: | 2/7/2019 |
Start Date: | January 31, 2019 |
End Date: | December 31, 2021 |
Contact: | IP Research |
Email: | IPresearch@jhmi.edu |
Phone: | 410-502-2533 |
The Impact of a Gravity Versus Vacuum Based Indwelling Tunneled Pleural Drainage System on Pain: A Multicenter, Randomized Trial
Malignant pleural effusion remains a debilitating complication of end stage cancer, which can
be greatly improved by the introduction of the indwelling tunneled pleural catheter (IPC).
However, there is no standard of care regarding drainage and limited data on the utility of
different drainage techniques. In addition, many patients develop discomfort and chest pain
during drainage. The investigators propose to evaluate gravity drainage and suction drainage
on quality of life measures and outcomes.
be greatly improved by the introduction of the indwelling tunneled pleural catheter (IPC).
However, there is no standard of care regarding drainage and limited data on the utility of
different drainage techniques. In addition, many patients develop discomfort and chest pain
during drainage. The investigators propose to evaluate gravity drainage and suction drainage
on quality of life measures and outcomes.
Indwelling tunneled pleural catheters (IPCs) are used to alleviate pleural effusion as a
first-line therapeutic (albeit palliative) intervention. Limited data currently exists on
drainage techniques and the impact the techniques may have on quality of life. Current
recommendations for IPC drainage range from daily drainage to once a week drainage, as well
as only when needed for dyspnea. It has been theorized that active drainage of effusions may
have an impact on the development of chest discomfort/pain, whereas passive regimens may
allow for more gradual intrathoracic pleural changes and potentially offer a difference in
drainage discomfort.
The objective of this investigation is to compare different drainage strategies of indwelling
pleural catheters (IPCs) regarding patient quality of life and outcomes. Patients will
undergo placement of a pleural catheter as per standard institutional protocol. Patients will
be randomized on a 1:1 basis into the suction drainage (active) arm or the gravity drainage
(passive) arm. Patients will receive follow-up at two weeks, four weeks, twelve weeks and
then as needed post IPC placement per standard clinical protocol. All patients will be asked
to fill out quality of life questionnaires and update drainage diary information with
patient's providers.
Patients will undergo standard care treatment throughout the disease course and no different
interventions regarding the pleural disease will be performed as a result of enrollment
within this study. Study interventions/procedures will consist of questionnaires and patient
self-reported documentation regarding patient's care and outcomes.
first-line therapeutic (albeit palliative) intervention. Limited data currently exists on
drainage techniques and the impact the techniques may have on quality of life. Current
recommendations for IPC drainage range from daily drainage to once a week drainage, as well
as only when needed for dyspnea. It has been theorized that active drainage of effusions may
have an impact on the development of chest discomfort/pain, whereas passive regimens may
allow for more gradual intrathoracic pleural changes and potentially offer a difference in
drainage discomfort.
The objective of this investigation is to compare different drainage strategies of indwelling
pleural catheters (IPCs) regarding patient quality of life and outcomes. Patients will
undergo placement of a pleural catheter as per standard institutional protocol. Patients will
be randomized on a 1:1 basis into the suction drainage (active) arm or the gravity drainage
(passive) arm. Patients will receive follow-up at two weeks, four weeks, twelve weeks and
then as needed post IPC placement per standard clinical protocol. All patients will be asked
to fill out quality of life questionnaires and update drainage diary information with
patient's providers.
Patients will undergo standard care treatment throughout the disease course and no different
interventions regarding the pleural disease will be performed as a result of enrollment
within this study. Study interventions/procedures will consist of questionnaires and patient
self-reported documentation regarding patient's care and outcomes.
Inclusion Criteria:
- Clinical indications for placement of IPC for malignant pleural effusion
a. Pleural effusion with symptomatic improvement in dyspnea after drainage of
ipsilateral effusion
- Clinically confident symptomatic malignant pleural effusion
1. Histocytological proof of pleural malignancy
2. Recurrent large pleural effusion in context of histologically proven cancer
outside the pleural space
- Plans for placement of IPC within ten days of enrollment
- Age > 17 years
- Sufficient fluid on ultrasound to allow for safe insertion of IPC
Exclusion Criteria:
- Recent (less than 60 days) thoracic surgery or chest trauma causing chronic pain
- Pregnant or lactating mothers
- Previous ipsilateral chemical pleurodesis
- Current contralateral indwelling pleural catheter
- Known rib or thoracic skeletal metastasis causing pain
- Concern for active pleural infection
- Respiratory failure
- Irreversible bleeding diathesis
- Inability to provide care for indwelling tunneled pleural catheter
- Significantly loculated pleural space precluding drainage of pleural space, for which
IPC alone will likely not offer symptomatic benefit
- Estimated life expectancy of < 30 days (however, active enrollment in hospice program
is not an exclusion criteria)
- Inability to read/understand/write in the English language
- Inability to follow-up for appointments/protocol
- Subject has any clinical condition, diagnosis, or social circumstance that, in the
opinion of the investigator would mean participation in the study would be
contraindicated.
- Enrollment in alternative pleural catheter trial that would preclude enrollment within
this trial
We found this trial at
5
sites
1211 Medical Center Dr
Nashville, Tennessee 37232
Nashville, Tennessee 37232
(615) 322-5000
Phone: 615-936-8422
Vanderbilt Univ Med Ctr Vanderbilt University Medical Center (VUMC) is a comprehensive healthcare facility dedicated...
Click here to add this to my saved trials
1800 Orleans St.
Baltimore, Maryland 21287
Baltimore, Maryland 21287
410-955-5000
Principal Investigator: Lonny Yarmus
Phone: 410-502-5224
Johns Hopkins Hospital Patients are the focus of everything we do at The Johns Hopkins...
Click here to add this to my saved trials
171 Ashley Avenue
Charleston, South Carolina 29425
Charleston, South Carolina 29425
843-792-1414
Phone: 843-792-9200
Medical University of South Carolina The Medical University of South Carolina (MUSC) has grown from...
Click here to add this to my saved trials
Click here to add this to my saved trials
5300 Tallman Ave NW
Seattle, Washington 98122
Seattle, Washington 98122
(206) 782-2700
Phone: 206-215-6800
Swedish Medical Center Since 1910, Swedish has been the region's hallmark for excellence in health...
Click here to add this to my saved trials