ACB + IPACK Block With or Without Local Infiltration in RA-TKA
Status: | Not yet recruiting |
---|---|
Conditions: | Orthopedic |
Therapuetic Areas: | Orthopedics / Podiatry |
Healthy: | No |
Age Range: | 21 - Any |
Updated: | 2/17/2019 |
Start Date: | February 2019 |
End Date: | May 2020 |
Contact: | Langan S Smith, BS |
Email: | langanssmith@kentuckyonehealth.org |
Phone: | 5025878222 |
Comparing ACB + IPACK Block With or Without Local Infiltration in Patients Undergoing Primary Robotic Arm-Assisted TKA
The purpose of this study is to compare the outcomes of an Adductor canal block (ACB) +
interspace between the popliteal artery and the capsule of the knee (IPACK) block along with
a single intraoperative injection of a standard local anesthetic that includes Ropivacaine,
Epinephrine, Ketorolac, Clonidine and saline to an ACB + IPACK block without the
intraoperative injection of a standard local anesthetic in patients undergoing Robotic
Arm-Assisted TKA (RA-TKA).
interspace between the popliteal artery and the capsule of the knee (IPACK) block along with
a single intraoperative injection of a standard local anesthetic that includes Ropivacaine,
Epinephrine, Ketorolac, Clonidine and saline to an ACB + IPACK block without the
intraoperative injection of a standard local anesthetic in patients undergoing Robotic
Arm-Assisted TKA (RA-TKA).
Inclusion Criteria:
1. Patient is over the age of 21
2. Patient is scheduled to undergo a unilateral, primary TKA, secondary to osteoarthritis
3. Patient agrees to participate as a study subject and signs the Informed Consent and
Research Authorization documents
4. Patient is able to read and speak English.
Exclusion Criteria:
1. Patient is under the age of 21
2. Patient's primary diagnosis is not osteoarthritis (e.g. post-traumatic arthritis)
3. Patient is scheduled to undergo a bilateral TKA surgery
4. Patient is unable to read and speak English
We found this trial at
1
site
Click here to add this to my saved trials