Comparison of Standard and Endoscope Assisted Endotracheal Intubation
Status: | Active, not recruiting |
---|---|
Conditions: | Gastrointestinal, Gastrointestinal |
Therapuetic Areas: | Gastroenterology |
Healthy: | No |
Age Range: | Any |
Updated: | 3/21/2019 |
Start Date: | August 30, 2018 |
End Date: | December 2020 |
Comparison of Standard Endotracheal Intubation [SEI] and Endoscope Assisted Endotracheal Intubation [EAE]
Comparison of standard endotracheal intubation and endoscopist-facilitated endotracheal
intubation
intubation
Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) procedures are typically performed
using general anesthesia. During anesthesia, the anesthesiologist inserts a breathing tube
(endotracheal tube) into the patient's wind pipe (trachea) and a machine helps the patient
breathe (mechanical ventilation) while they are unconscious. The breathing tube is inserted
with a patient laying on his/her back using a rigid metallic device (laryngoscope) to guide
tube placement. The unconscious patient is then moved from the portable bed onto the X-ray
table by nursing staff. The patient also has to be turned to lie on their stomach on the
X-ray table for the procedure. This standard approach carries a small risk of patient injury
during breathing tube placement as well as while moving and turning the unconscious patient
onto the X-ray table.
At our endoscopy unit, endoscopists have, on several occasions, used a slim gastroscope to
place the breathing tube under direct visualization in patients who are already positioned on
their stomach for ERCP. This approach is rapid and has been uniformly successful and safe.
We hypothesize that this endoscopist-facilitated intubation approach may expedite the
procedure and minimize ergonomic strain for staff during patient repositioning while
minimizing patient injury during breathing tube placement and repositioning. This study seeks
to formally compares the two approaches for placement of a breathing tube.
using general anesthesia. During anesthesia, the anesthesiologist inserts a breathing tube
(endotracheal tube) into the patient's wind pipe (trachea) and a machine helps the patient
breathe (mechanical ventilation) while they are unconscious. The breathing tube is inserted
with a patient laying on his/her back using a rigid metallic device (laryngoscope) to guide
tube placement. The unconscious patient is then moved from the portable bed onto the X-ray
table by nursing staff. The patient also has to be turned to lie on their stomach on the
X-ray table for the procedure. This standard approach carries a small risk of patient injury
during breathing tube placement as well as while moving and turning the unconscious patient
onto the X-ray table.
At our endoscopy unit, endoscopists have, on several occasions, used a slim gastroscope to
place the breathing tube under direct visualization in patients who are already positioned on
their stomach for ERCP. This approach is rapid and has been uniformly successful and safe.
We hypothesize that this endoscopist-facilitated intubation approach may expedite the
procedure and minimize ergonomic strain for staff during patient repositioning while
minimizing patient injury during breathing tube placement and repositioning. This study seeks
to formally compares the two approaches for placement of a breathing tube.
Inclusion Criteria:
- Patients undergoing ERCP at Stanford University Medical Center
Exclusion Criteria:
- Unable to consent
- Contra-indication to general anesthesia
We found this trial at
1
site
Stanford Univ Med Ctr The Medical Center is uniquely advantaged by its location on the...
Click here to add this to my saved trials