Plastic Stents Compared With Metal Stents in Treating Patients With Malignant Dysphagia Caused by Esophageal Cancer or Gastroesophageal Junction Cancer
Status: | Withdrawn |
---|---|
Conditions: | Cancer, Cancer, Gastrointestinal |
Therapuetic Areas: | Gastroenterology, Oncology |
Healthy: | No |
Age Range: | 18 - 120 |
Updated: | 3/22/2019 |
Start Date: | December 2006 |
End Date: | April 11, 2008 |
A Quality of Life Comparison in Patients With Malignant Dysphagia Treated With Either Self-Expanding Plastic Stents (SEPS) or Self-Expanding Metal Stents (SEMS)
RATIONALE: Placing a stent in the esophagus may lessen swallowing difficulties and improve
quality of life in patients with malignant dysphagia caused by esophageal cancer or
gastroesophageal junction cancer.
PURPOSE: This randomized clinical trial is studying self-expanding plastic stents to see how
well they work compared with self-expanding metal stents in treating patients with malignant
dysphagia caused by esophageal cancer or gastroesophageal junction cancer.
quality of life in patients with malignant dysphagia caused by esophageal cancer or
gastroesophageal junction cancer.
PURPOSE: This randomized clinical trial is studying self-expanding plastic stents to see how
well they work compared with self-expanding metal stents in treating patients with malignant
dysphagia caused by esophageal cancer or gastroesophageal junction cancer.
OBJECTIVES:
Primary
- Assess differences from baseline in health-related quality of life of patients with
malignant dysphagia due to cancer of the esophagus or gastroesophageal junction
palliated with self-expanding plastic stents (SEPS) compared to those who receive
self-expanding metal stents (SEMS).
Secondary
- Perform a cost-effective analysis of each type of stent by independent evaluation of the
rates of SEPS-related and SEMS-related morbidity that necessitates repeat endoscopic
interventions and/or additional healthcare costs in these patients.
- Analyze effective palliation (degree and duration of improvement of dysphagia) in these
patients.
- Determine the individual rates of complication associated with each type of esophageal
stent in these patients.
OUTLINE: This is a randomized, controlled study. Patients are randomized to 1 of 2 treatment
arms.
- Arm I: Patients undergo placement of a self-expanding metal stent on day 1.
- Arm II: Patients undergo placement of a self-expanding plastic stent on day 1.
Health-related quality of life is assessed at baseline, 30 days, and 3 months.
PROJECTED ACCRUAL: A total of 90 patients will be accrued for this study.
Primary
- Assess differences from baseline in health-related quality of life of patients with
malignant dysphagia due to cancer of the esophagus or gastroesophageal junction
palliated with self-expanding plastic stents (SEPS) compared to those who receive
self-expanding metal stents (SEMS).
Secondary
- Perform a cost-effective analysis of each type of stent by independent evaluation of the
rates of SEPS-related and SEMS-related morbidity that necessitates repeat endoscopic
interventions and/or additional healthcare costs in these patients.
- Analyze effective palliation (degree and duration of improvement of dysphagia) in these
patients.
- Determine the individual rates of complication associated with each type of esophageal
stent in these patients.
OUTLINE: This is a randomized, controlled study. Patients are randomized to 1 of 2 treatment
arms.
- Arm I: Patients undergo placement of a self-expanding metal stent on day 1.
- Arm II: Patients undergo placement of a self-expanding plastic stent on day 1.
Health-related quality of life is assessed at baseline, 30 days, and 3 months.
PROJECTED ACCRUAL: A total of 90 patients will be accrued for this study.
DISEASE CHARACTERISTICS:
- Histologically confirmed primary cancer of the esophagus or gastroesophageal junction
- Squamous cell or other type
- Diagnosis of malignant dysphagia
- Disease deemed surgically inoperable, but may be any of the following:
- Locally contained
- Locally advanced
- Metastatic
- Unresponsive to previous chemoradiotherapy
- Recurrent despite previous surgical resection
- Must be either an inpatient OR outpatient at Johns Hopkins Hospital
- No known tracheal compression by tumor burden
PATIENT CHARACTERISTICS:
- Karnofsky performance status 50-100%
- Life expectancy ≥ 6 months
- Platelet count > 50,000/mm³
- INR < 1.5
PRIOR CONCURRENT THERAPY:
- See Disease Characteristics
- Prior surgery, chemotherapy, biologic therapy, or radiotherapy allowed
- No concurrent surgery, chemotherapy, biologic therapy, or radiotherapy
We found this trial at
1
site
Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins The name Johns Hopkins has become synonymous...
Click here to add this to my saved trials